Fiji Law Society President, Wylie Clarke says they have nothing against the Speaker of Parliament and are strongly asking for the bills to go through public consultations after Attorney General, Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum said he is appalled at the open letter from the Fiji Law Society where they are trying to bring disrepute to the Office of the Speaker.
Clarke says the point they are making is that one hour’s debate is not enough time for matters that are so important.
He says they are asking for the careful scrutinisation of the bills for the administration of justice.
/+AUDIO-135826472860243a8556516ff4fe31.mp3+AUDIO/
Clarke says they respect the Attorney General’s views but the Law Society has strong views that the bills should go through public consultations.
/+AUDIO-124462710660243a9dfb1832244b10.mp3+AUDIO/
He says they do not want the bills to be rushed through parliament.
Clarke stresses that they are in no way working with the opposition, and whatever the opposition has to say are matters for them.
While responding to the Law Society’s open letter calling on parliament to defer debate on two bills in the current parliament session, Sayed-Khaiyum says the Law Society has obviously got the law wrong and it kind of bothers him as a few lawyers got together and wrote the letter.
In the letter, the Society had said that with respect, to restrict matters of such great public importance to one hour’s Parliamentary debate (as suggested by the Speaker of the House) would be a serious failure of leadership.
Sayed-Khaiyum says the Speaker of Parliament does not decide on the one hour debate time on a bill. He says it is the motion that is put on the floor and that is based on the parliamentary standing orders.
The Minister says the Law Society is insinuating that the Speaker has done something wrong.
/+AUDIO-210950135260235eb9f6d0bb330737.mp3+AUDIO/
Sayed-Khaiyum raises the question whether the Law Society is a mouthpiece of the opposition.
/+AUDIO-6899090360235ead6ad805c9af6252.mp3+AUDIO/
He says the Society is wrong as Australia and New Zealand have a the jury system and once you have a jury, the decision or the verdict of the jury must be followed by the courts.
Sayed-Khaiyum says in Fiji, the assessors’ opinion need not be followed by the judge as it is optional.
He says the whole point is about getting consistency in law.
/+AUDIO-145194314960235ea2615b417b621f.mp3+AUDIO/
The Minister says Fiji and Vanuatu are the only two Pacific island countries that have the assessor system in High Court criminal trials.
He says there is only a handful of assessors in Fiji – about 30 to 40 assessors that are doing the circuit.
Sayed-Khaiyum says the Law Society has the audacity to say that corruption is not so complex and not so widespread. He says they should talk to the international agencies that deal with Fiji on the ratification of the UN Convention Against Corruption.
He further says that corruption corrodes public confidence and undermines the economy and there needs to be an emphasis on it by having an Anti Corruption Division in the court system.
